Date of Award

Spring 2023

Degree Name

Bachelor of Science

Department

Chemistry and Physics; College of Arts & Sciences

First Advisor

Dr. Augusto Macalalag

Second Advisor

Dr. Linda Mascavage

Abstract

This senior thesis investigated what ways, if any, STEM professors incorporated active learning pedagogy in their undergraduate classroom in a small private university in the northeast USA. STEM pedagogy was investigated because of the increasing prominence of active learning methods in the classroom compared to the didactic type of teaching that was prominent in the past (Eichler, 2020). A qualitative case study of five STEM professors was conducted and involved collecting data from biographical questions, a one-hour interview, and the analysis of a document provided by the professor that could have been a lesson plan, an assignment, or an activity they created during the Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 semesters. Four themes emerged from my analysis of data: (a) considering students’ prior knowledge, (b) scaffolding students’ learning experiences, (c) imagining and revising instructional sequence to guide student learning, and (d) supporting students’ learning through various resources. These are the active learning strategies that were commonly found in answers from the interview questions. These findings suggest that STEM professors implement active learning strategies in their classrooms. My data also found that none of the professors in this study has completed any formal education in active learning frameworks. This study showcases that STEM professors may be applying active learning in their classrooms because of their experience as teachers rather than a formal education on active learning pedagogy.

Share

COinS
 

What is Active Learning? Perspectives from Five STEM Professors' Teaching Practices in Their Classrooms

This senior thesis investigated what ways, if any, STEM professors incorporated active learning pedagogy in their undergraduate classroom in a small private university in the northeast USA. STEM pedagogy was investigated because of the increasing prominence of active learning methods in the classroom compared to the didactic type of teaching that was prominent in the past (Eichler, 2020). A qualitative case study of five STEM professors was conducted and involved collecting data from biographical questions, a one-hour interview, and the analysis of a document provided by the professor that could have been a lesson plan, an assignment, or an activity they created during the Fall 2022 and Spring 2023 semesters. Four themes emerged from my analysis of data: (a) considering students’ prior knowledge, (b) scaffolding students’ learning experiences, (c) imagining and revising instructional sequence to guide student learning, and (d) supporting students’ learning through various resources. These are the active learning strategies that were commonly found in answers from the interview questions. These findings suggest that STEM professors implement active learning strategies in their classrooms. My data also found that none of the professors in this study has completed any formal education in active learning frameworks. This study showcases that STEM professors may be applying active learning in their classrooms because of their experience as teachers rather than a formal education on active learning pedagogy.